New Referee Course – We Need You – Sign Up

New Officials

With a huge shortage of officials throughout the nation, and worryingly here in the Bay Area on our doorstep, we are looking to put together another referee course. Leave your information at the following link, and with enough interest we will host our third course of the summer –

Youth sports needs officials to help provide the positive learning experience the youth athlete craves. Join our excellent group of officials, giving back to the youth of the local community. Officials are compensated, adding the already rewarding experience of being actively involved in the community and being a positive role model for the youth players.

Visit our referee page at the following link.


Week 7 Review, Supporting the Individual Process

This weekend we approach the first game for most of the players for nearly two years. Above anything else, we are so excited just to see kids back on the field again. With that said, we must look beyond emotions of returning to the field and operate within our structure. The following information will provide insight and depth to the soccer operations around a game day.

We are proactive and focus on what we can do. This is opposed to a reactive approach where we prioritize a response to opposition. Our priority is the Fremont YSC individual player, and therefore process orientated and not outcome. The following video is great at grounding us as adults in the game:

Jersey Numbers and Team Composition

2013 and 2012 teams are created through having players of similar birth age. Players born early in the year are FN I, and players born later in the year are FN II. This is completely different to other teams who look to either load by playing ability, or balance through a mix. Our is purely based on age, and for reason. Research shows that youth performance has no positive correlation to future performance and ability, with ‘better’ players largely dominant due to early maturation, or genetics in their size, speed, and power. The research shows that early identification is detrimental to long term participation, and most elite level players are not identified until 16 – 19 years old, with many early identified players dropping out. Our method of assigning players treats the players as an age group rather than a team (utilized by Icelandic FA, one of the most successful countries based on population size), and addresses Relative Age Effect where there is no bias towards players based on size due to being chronologically older (utilized by Tottenham Hotspur).

2013, 2012, 2011, and 2010

Jersey numbers are assigned to players based on their birth date. This is so coaches and parents have a visual aid in recognizing the Relative Age Effect, but also grounding us when we stray away from the process and slip into the temptation of comparing players against other. Players wearing a higher number will be the youngest in the age group, and therefore potentially almost a full year younger than other players. We must focus our attention on the individual, and not teammates, nor opponents.

2011 and Older are assigned to a team based on their rate of development in reference to our player pathway, and not ‘good’ or ‘bad’. We would prefer to do this at a much older age, but we are still working against a culture that doesn’t support this. What we must do though is understand that players are in an environment to support ‘flow’, where the challenge presented can be matched by skill level of the individual. Finding this state of flow provides an appropriate challenge, and a focus on the process, which has a positive knock-on effect for the psychosocial pillar in confidence and motivation. As soon as we switch to focusing on outcome, we undo all these great positives from a process driven approach. Players in youth development are in current rates of development, and are not ‘elite’ or ‘poor’, we need to move away from this perception.

Field Size and Dimensions

2009 and 2008 (2008 missing the move up due to Covid) will be playing 11 v 11 for the first time, and on full size fields. This is a huge jump from the 9 v 9, and for the 2009 having only played a few months in 9 v 9 from the 7 v 7 this is a massive jump (something US Soccer should have considered for this season). Players will struggle to perform all the actions needed, and therefore recognizing the game insight of a player is important. A player can make the correct decision, but still be developing their physiological pillar and therefore the pass they pick out cannot be performed as they do not yet have the strength in kick to pass over a longer distance. A great video to see how this effects players:


Players over a large range could be going through maturation. An early developer could be up to 3 years ahead in maturation, while a late developer could be up to 3 years late. Even within one team that’s a 6-year swing, based on the two extremes, but another reason why we need to focus on the individual. While going through maturation the physiological challenges are great with a temporary loss of agility and co-ordination, which will affect skill performance and athletic ability. These are temporary, and during this time we need to be patient with players and showing empathy to what they are going through.

Meet the 2021/22 Season Club Captains

We are pleased to share with you all, our 2021/22 Season Club Captains.

Our club captains can be recognized as the only players in the club who wear the #9 jersey. The captains are from our Senior teams, and have demonstrated the behaviors and values of Fremont YSC, and honor the jersey in memory of Arunay Pruthi.

Congratulations to the captains, we are incredibly proud of you.

No Practices, Labor Day

A reminder there are no programs running today with it being Labor Day.

We hope everyone has had an enjoyable Holiday weekend, and safe travels to those out of town.

Week 6 Review, Reference for Learning in Short- and Long-Term Development

The Talent Identification and Team Selection process is not defined by creating winning teams or grouping players together that have chemistry and size to power their way though games on a weekend. By selecting teams purely in reference to a playing bracket or their ability to win a certain level of league or cup, we are getting pulled into the ‘results trap’. This is where we use a short-term outcome of a game result, to define if learning is taking place. Youth sports are not defined by wins and losses, and neither do early ‘elite’ level players provide an accurate indicator of a players future performance levels. All of the research proves this, yet the youth sports model is not adjusting to incorporate what we know, and governing bodies are still not utilizing this information to form its coach education.

A long-term player development plan is always communicated to parents at every club, how we are developing the players for the future. But ultimately, without the process of short-term goals and objectives, and ensuring players have fun and enjoy the now, the long-term player development plan is redundant. If burning out player from early specialization, treating young kids as elite athletes, and focusing more on the league, cup, and tournament entered across numerous States, is still the priority, then there are a huge number of potential players not reaching the elite levels of senior soccer, and a significant number of young talented players not making it to senior levels.

There here and now is more important, and what frames the evaluation and selection process.

Firstly, we identify the age-appropriate expectations of the individual player, in reference to the game model. Providing a road map towards that long term goal, but with a short-term view to guide the process.

Fundamental to Specific                                                                            Specific to Performance






















The evaluation process uses this short-term goal to help assign players to groups in which they can find the appropriate level of challenge and accompanying support. To often this process is seen as excellent, good, poor; and teams perceived to be ‘elite’ or not good. This is far from what a talent identification is aiming to do. Talent Identification is a predication of future potential, guided by the current rate of development. From the game model, age-appropriate individual elements are identified from player structures, and objectively viewed against the perceived rate of development.

Age and maturation is hugely influential on the youth players development, and to group players into teams of ability at ages below maturation is not found in any research to be accurate future predictors nor provide any benefit to the individual. In fact, it can be detrimental through the relative age effect. Where players are selected based on their characteristics through early maturation. Early physiological and cognitive development over technical performance.

To address this the Fremont YSC U9 and U10’s are not assigned by perceived rate of development, but by birth month as an age group, with club age group numbers assigned to their jerseys in reference to their age, providing a reminder that players should not be compared against each other, but focused on individually. The process takes priority over any short-term outcome, and curriculum design must match these objectives, and be heavily influenced by deliberate play to ensure a fun and engaging present, so the long term development can be realistic, through focusing on the now.